tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8436306896448667918.post2575128295463819108..comments2023-11-02T15:17:56.793+00:00Comments on THIS IS A TROLL FREE ZONE: Beds and Luton Mental Health PartnershipTrust conducts investigation but doesn't make it public.That's not my name!http://www.blogger.com/profile/17064348309163649672noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8436306896448667918.post-68275096023863269712009-05-13T18:08:00.000+01:002009-05-13T18:08:00.000+01:00Hallo there PG
Long time no correspondence. Maybe...Hallo there PG<br /><br />Long time no correspondence. Maybe too long??? <br /><br />Water under the bridge and all that.<br /><br />Having thought about this, because if you (me that is) are going to write something of such importance is important to think seriously about it, I am not sure corporate manslaughter would be legally what is acceptable (to the legal system) but I am sure a charge that befits the continual systematic failures and the severity of the outcomes warrants more than an investigation that is then hidden..until someone (or in this case 'Three Counties Radio) has the guts to dig it up.<br /><br />From what you have written it is not a one of set of incidents either. So perhaps a legal precedent needs to be set.That's not my name!https://www.blogger.com/profile/17064348309163649672noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8436306896448667918.post-39539953169722711172009-05-13T01:35:00.000+01:002009-05-13T01:35:00.000+01:00On second reading its not clear as to the depth of...On second reading its not clear as to the depth of the information and looks likely the Beds and Luton Trust has so far trickled out what it has wanted to control . <br /><br />Its easy to non-confidentialise reports and make sure names and address are not in there, and the events are so serious that patient confidentiality has to give way where it can be shown that is in the public interest.<br /><br />These fucking pratts at the Trust were supposed to be keeping this man safe and the public safe from him . Thats the core of the real story and why they failed - its overiding.. <br /><br />I agree corporate manslaughter via neglect is a possibility .PatientGuardhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14912582750951502918noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8436306896448667918.post-91096101137761135882009-05-13T01:25:00.000+01:002009-05-13T01:25:00.000+01:00Well Well Well
This is overdue and it sets a pre...Well Well Well <br /><br />This is overdue and it sets a precedent I think - a real precedent because there are other long drawn out enquiries which have been "confidentialised" out of public sight by both SHA's and Trusts .. <br /><br />The one in Birmingham is the very similar case of Glaister Butler who knifed and killed Det Constable Swindells.. A report was issued but has disappeared up the Trust's backside so far ..The NHS top staff hate accountability. <br /><br />A public interest argument has now been upheld and this must surely form the basis of some serious worry for other Trusts who are now going to get what they deserved - public examination ..<br /><br />.PatientGuardhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14912582750951502918noreply@blogger.com